Legal Opinion
James v. City of St. Petersburg
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 22, 1993No. 92-2291PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ATKINS, Senior District Judge:
Appellant Andrea James (James) sued the City of St. Petersburg (City), various city officials and the previous owner of her duplex after her water service was terminated without notice. James appeals the district court’s order granting the City of St. Peters-burg’s (City) Motion for Summary Judgment and denying her Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The district court held that the City did not violate James’s constitutional rights by terminating her water service because the service was a matter of contract not a circumstance actionable under 42 U.S.C.A. §…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Murphy v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- James v. City of St. PetersburgCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- James v. City Of St. PetersburgCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Baker v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Haley v. KijakaziDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- James v. City of St. Petersburg, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.