Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 10, 2005No. SC03-933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We initially accepted jurisdiction of this case based on express and direct conflict between the decision below, Ryan v. Lobo de Gonzalez, 841 So.2d 510 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003), and our decision in Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. S.A.P., 835 So.2d 1091 (Fla.2002). A majority no longer exists, however, to retain jurisdiction and decide the case on the merits. We therefore exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, LEWIS, and BELL, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD and QUINCE, JJ., dissent. CANTERO, J., dissents with an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Florida Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services v. S.A.P.Supreme Court of Florida · 2002
  2. Ryan v. Lobo De GonzalezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Vitamins Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
  2. Rubio v. Archdiocese of Miami, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API