Legal Opinion

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 15, 2006No. 05-7002PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUDGMENT

2Per curiam

Upon consideration of the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and the briefs and arguments of the parties, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that the request for certification to the Supreme Court of Florida be denied.

On December 1, 2003, Southeast Milk, Inc. (“Appellant”), an indirect purchaser of vitamin products, filed a price fixing suit pursuant to Florida law against several vitamin manufacturers (“Appellees”). After Appellees removed from Florida state court to federal court based on…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Albert Kornberg and Laura Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  3. Major League Baseball v. MorsaniSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. Suzanne E. Tidler, and Helene Mankowitz v. Eli Lilly and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  5. Davis v. MonahanSupreme Court of Florida · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Enron Corporation SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  2. Tom Hawk v. Pershing, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  3. Newby v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Wilchfort v. KnightDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  5. Weatherly v. Pershing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API