Legal Opinion

Blair v. Halliburton Company

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 27, 1970No. 6103PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PRESLAR, Justice.

This is a case in which summary judgment was rendered for the plaintiff on a promissory note. We reverse and remand for the reason that the appellee-plaintiff’s proof was not conclusive that it was the owner and holder of the note.

Appellee filed its petition in this cause with what may be termed the usual averments for a cause of action by the payee of a promissory note against the maker thereof. The petition stated a cause of action sufficient in all respects, and attached to it as an exhibit was a copy of the note. It was not a sworn pleading. The appellant-defendant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gibbs v. General Motors CorporationTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Gulbenkian v. PennTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gardner v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Alexander v. Houston Oil Field Material Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Pat H. Stanford, Inc. v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schindler v. Ag Aero Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Haupt v. ColdwellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  3. First State Bank of Chico v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Bruce v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API