Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Chico v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 22, 1972No. 17360PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANGDON, Justice.

The appellant Bank sued the appellee Smith upon a promissory note and to foreclose a security interest upon 17 cows. The trial was upon amended pleadings. In effect, the defenses alleged were non est fac-tum and want of consideration. After the appellant had rested its case appellee moved for an instructed verdict on the ground, among others, that appellant had failed to meet its burden of proving that it was the present holder of the note sued upon. The court charged the jury, peremptorily, to find for the defendant. Judgment went accordingly. The appellant moved for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webb v. ReynoldsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  2. Alexander v. Houston Oil Field Material Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Blair v. Halliburton CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Shahan v. EakinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Savings & Loan Association of Lubbock, State Federal Savings & Loan Association of Lubbock v. Liberty Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  2. McKirgan v. American Hospital Supply Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API