United States v. Gibbs
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
The government brings this appeal challenging the District Court’s ruling that a prior conviction for wearing body armor while committing a felony in violation of 11 Del. C. § 1449(a) is not a predicate offense under the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). We hold that the body armor conviction is an ACCA predicate offense because it involved the possession of cocaine with intent to distribute. It is “a serious drug offense.” 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). We will vacate the ruling of the District Court and remand for sentencing in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States v. Alexander, JoeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Dale M. Preston, A/K/A Jami Mansour ShabazzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. WhindletonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- United States v. TrentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Joseph WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. BynumCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Conrad BlairCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.