Legal Opinion

Newton v. Brooks

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

The superintendent of the Oregon State Hospital appeals an order in habeas corpus discharging from his custody a person who had been committed under ORS 136.730 following acquittal of criminal charges on the ground of “insanity”. The controlling statute reads as follows:

ORS 136.730. “If the defense is the insanity of the defendant, the jury shall be instructed to state, if it finds him not guilty on that ground, that fact in the verdict, and the court shall thereupon, if it deems his being at large dangerous to the public peace or safety, order him to be committed to any hospital or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Barnes v. BehanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Robertson v. CameronDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. ChavezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. State v. CarterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
  4. Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  5. State v. BlubaughWashington Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API