Legal Opinion

State v. Winchester

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1909PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Original application by the State of North Dakota for a writ of certiorari to the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District and the Hon. W. H. Winchester, Judge thereof.

1Opinion of the CourtCarmody, J.

This is an application for an original writ of certiorari on behalf of the state, the plaintiff, in State v. Duncan J. McGillisv On the return day both parties appeared by counsel, submitted their arguments, and stipulated that .the case might be disposed of on its merits on the moving papers of the Attorney General and the return of the respondent.

On June 1, 1909, the Attorney General filed an information in the district court of Burleigh county charging Duncan J. MeGillis with the crime of knowingly permitting a building owned by him to be used for the purpose of unlawful dealing in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Commonwealth v. BalphSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. People v. PetersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. People v. FuhrmannMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Territory v. EganSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PuschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  2. State ex rel. Lemke v. District Court of Stutsman CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  3. State ex rel. Miller v. District CourtNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. State Ex Rel. Jacobson v. District Court of Ward County of the Fifth Judicial DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. BossartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API