United States v. Ladeaux
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
In this case, Defendant-Appellant John Ladeaux contends that two requests made of him during a traffic stop — to (1) exit the vehicle and (2) roll up the windows and open the vents — violated his Fourth Amendment rights such that the contraband discovered during the stop must be suppressed. Because the district court did not properly consider the effect of the second request 1 under the burden-shifting scheme set out in United States v. Nava-Ramirez, 210 F.3d 1128 (10th Cir.2000), we remand this case for the' district court to address that issue in the first instance.
BACKGR…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. AlbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BecksteadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- People v. BarteltIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
- United States v. McLinnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.