Legal Opinion

United States v. Ladeaux

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 12, 2006No. 05-8097PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

In this case, Defendant-Appellant John Ladeaux contends that two requests made of him during a traffic stop — to (1) exit the vehicle and (2) roll up the windows and open the vents — violated his Fourth Amendment rights such that the contraband discovered during the stop must be suppressed. Because the district court did not properly consider the effect of the second request 1 under the burden-shifting scheme set out in United States v. Nava-Ramirez, 210 F.3d 1128 (10th Cir.2000), we remand this case for the' district court to address that issue in the first instance.

BACKGR…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Maryland v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Muehler v. MenaSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. AlbertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. BecksteadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. People v. BarteltIllinois Supreme Court · 2011
  4. United States v. McLinnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. MartinezDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API