Legal Opinion

People v. Bartelt

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 2011No. 107276PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Karmeier

Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Thomas and Gar-man concurred in the judgment and opinion.

Justice Freeman dissented, with opinion, joined by Justices Burke and Theis.

OPINION

After a lawful traffic stop, a police officer performed a set-up procedure, which entailed ordering the driver, defendant, Cheryl L. Bartelt, to roll up her truck’s windows and turn the ventilation system’s blowers on high before a second officer conducted a canine sniff of the exterior of her truck. The dog alerted on both doors of the truck, and a subsequent search of the truck resulted in discovery of drug evidence.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  2. O.S. v. O.S.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2018
  3. People v. CummingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. People v. GravesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  5. Village of Downers Grove v. Village Square III Condominium Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API