Legal Opinion

Packer River Terminal, Inc. v. City of Minneapolis

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 12, 1989No. C1-89-827PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PARKER, Judge.

Packer River Terminal petitioned the trial court to compel arbitration of its dispute with the City of Minneapolis regarding the terms of an operating agreement. Packer River Terminal appeals the denial of its motion to compel. We reverse.

FACTS

On June 10,1983, the City of Minneapolis entered into an agreement whereby Packer River Terminal, Inc. (Packer River), would operate the Upper Harbor Terminal owned by the city and located on the Mississippi River. Under the agreement, Packer River receives revenues from customers using the shipping facilities and in turn pays the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Layne-Minnesota Co. v. Regents of the University of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Prestressed Concrete, Inc. v. Adolfson & Peterson, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Millwrights Local 548, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. Robert J. Pugleasa Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Mears Park Holding Corp. v. Morse/Diesel, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Local No. 1119, American Federation State, County, & Municipal Employees v. Mesabi Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  2. Duluth Police Local v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API