Legal Opinion

Barstow v. City National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1938No. 30275PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

In this case it appears that the City National Bank of Lincoln filed a claim against the estate of Charles D. *608Mathews, deceased, in the amount of $268,135.98 and interest. The claim was allowed and no appeal taken therefrom. Several years later the executor of the estate of Charles D. Mathews filed a motion in the same proceeding to require the bank to satisfy its claim for the reason that the notes on which the claim was based were canceled, paid and discharged. The county court denied the executor’s motion and no appeal was taken therefrom by the executor. However, the appellee, W. T.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kansas & Arkansas Valley Railway Co. v. FitzhughSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  2. Little Rock & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. WellsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  3. Drexel v. PuseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Trotter v. StrongIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Utilities Insurance v. StuartNebraska Supreme Court · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. McGillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  2. J. J. Schaefer Livestock Hauling, Inc. v. Gretna State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Meek v. GratzfeldNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Coffey v. MannNebraska Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API