Legal Opinion

Fresno Home-Packing Co. v. Fruit-Cleaning Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 7, 1900No. 558PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California.

1Opinion of the Court

DE HAVEN, District Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court for the Northern district of California. The action was brought by the appellee, the Eruit-Cleaning Company, for infringement of letters patent No. 543,834, for “improvements in mechanism for seeding fruit,” issued to the appellee, as assignee of George C. La Due. The decree adjudged the patent valid, and that appellants had infringed the first five claims thereof, and also perpetually enjoined them from further infringing said claims. 94 Fed. 845. It is alleged in the bill of complaint that one George O. La Due was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. De La Vergne Refrigerating MacHine Co. v. FeatherstoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Percifull v. PlattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  3. Arthur v. WestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  4. Winter v. StockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Gille v. HuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whitcomb v. WhitcombSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  2. Chisholm-Ryder Co. v. BuckDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API