Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Cliff Gold Mining Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1934No. 1855, 1856PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Riner, Justice.

These two cases in this court are predicated upon the same record and come here under the direct appeal method of review, for the purpose of questioning a judgment of the District Court of Albany County. Specifications in error have been filed by the several parties, each claiming the judgment to be erroneous in certain particulars. The briefs in these cases have been consolidated. In consequence of these facts and the views we entertain concerning the questions raised, one opinion will suffice to dispose of the litigation as it now appears at bar.

The action in which the record…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Mineral Park Land Co. v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Virginia Iron, Coal & Coke Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Cosden Oil & Gas Co. v. MossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Fritzler v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Skyco Resources, LLP, a Texas limited liability partnership v. Family Tree Corporation, a Wyoming corporation and JD4, LLC, a Delaware limited liability companyWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API