Mulcahy & Gibson, Inc. v. Richman
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
_ Af Law. Action by Mulcahy & Gibson, Incorporated, to use of tbe Nam. vil Sarecy A. ay, against Joseph A. Richman. On motions for nt-,,: Nial and lot judgment for defendant on point reserved.
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, District Judge.
The National Surety Company, use plaintiff, brought this suit as assignee of Mulcahy & Gibson, Incorporated, upon a judgment recovered by the latter in the Supreme Court of New York, county of New York, against tbe defendant, in the sum of $6,436.64. At. the trial the plaintiff offered in evidence an exemplification of the record of the said judgment, with an assignment to the use plaintiff, and rested. The defendant offered in evidence a copy of the charter of the National Surety Company and rested.
[1] Under the direction of the court, the jury rendered a verdict in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Reynolds v. StocktonSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Simmons v. SaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925