Legal Opinion

Bly v. Swafford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 14, 1947No. 13756PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, Justice.

Appellees, husband and wife, as plaintiffs below, brought suit for the damages suffered by Mrs. Swafford when bitten by the dog of appellants on May 18, 1945; the cause being predicated upon negligence of the Blys in keeping a vicious dog and permitting it to inflict aforesaid injury. Trial to the court resulted in a plaintiffs’ judgment for $750, which is the basis of this appeal.

As to scene of the occurrence, Mrs. Swafford, preparatory to'visiting a nearby friend, had just alighted from an automobile that was parked in an alley or driveway at the rear of defendants’ premises,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dakan v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. Turner v. ShropshireCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  3. Moore v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marshall v. RanneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Arrington Funeral Home v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Wells v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Bradley v. HendricksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  5. HE Butt Grocery Company v. PerezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API