Legal Opinion
Flemming v. Wurzberger
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 21, 2007No. 05-CV-6252LPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Woodrow Flemming, appearing pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, an inmate in the custody of the New York State Department of Correctional Services (“DOCS”), alleges that defendants Bezalel Wurzberger, M.D., Timothy Kemp, LCSW, 1 and P.A. Louise Tichenor, who were at all relevant times employed by the New York State Office of Mental Health (“OHM”), violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution by acting with deliberate indifference to his medical needs. 2 Specifically,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allah v. PooleDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Lee v. FrederickDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Green v. McGinnisDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Pettus v. WrightDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007