Legal Opinion

Keech v. Mead Johnson and Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1990No. 63PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge:

This case involves an appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County sustaining the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer of the defendant, Joan M. Magee, M.D. Plaintiffs/appellants are Harvey Lee Keech and Suzanne M. Keech, individually and as parents and guardians of Daniel Keech, a minor. We affirm.

“As is our function upon an appeal from a decision of the court below sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer, we must accept as true every relevant fact sufficiently averred in the plaintiffs’ complaint together with…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  3. Collins v. HandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. McConnell v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Hodgson v. BigelowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Baker v. Cambridge Chase, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Wu v. SpenceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Laconis v. Burlington County Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Gentzler v. AtleeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Nigon, L. v. Jewell, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API