Legal Opinion

In re C.P.W.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 24, 2009No. 101,017PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

This appeal raises the question of whether the State must prove that a sex offender acted with specific intent in failing to comply with provisions of the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA), K.S.A. 22-4901 et seq. We hold that K.S.A. 22-4903, which subjects to criminal liability “[a]ny person who is required to register as provided in the Kansas offender registration act who violates any of the provisions of such act,” does not identify or require a particular intent beyond the general intent required by K.S.A. 21-3201 for all crimes.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  3. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  4. State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. CookSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. In re D.E.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  3. State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
  4. State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  5. State v. LiawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API