In re C.P.W.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Luckert, J.:
This appeal raises the question of whether the State must prove that a sex offender acted with specific intent in failing to comply with provisions of the Kansas Offender Registration Act (KORA), K.S.A. 22-4901 et seq. We hold that K.S.A. 22-4903, which subjects to criminal liability “[a]ny person who is required to register as provided in the Kansas offender registration act who violates any of the provisions of such act,” does not identify or require a particular intent beyond the general intent required by K.S.A. 21-3201 for all crimes.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- State v. SkolautSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- State v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- State v. CookSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- In re D.E.R.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- State v. DiazCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2010
- State v. FinchSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
- State v. LiawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.