Legal Opinion
Boise Cascade Corp. v. State Ex Rel. Board of Forestry
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 5, 2007No. 932018; A126743PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
This inverse condemnation case comes to us with a substantial procedural history, an account of which is set out below. Following trial after the latest remand, a jury determined that the state had taken Boise Cascade Corporation’s property in violation of the Fifth Amendment by temporarily prohibiting logging and that Boise should be compensated in the amount of $25. Boise appeals and the Oregon Board of Forestry (the state) cross-appeals. Because we agree with the state’s arguments on cross-appeal, we reverse.
I. BACKGROUND
The historical and procedural facts relevant to our decision, which…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gould v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Parker v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Parker v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- Wolf and TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008