Legal Opinion
Pagano v. Bennett
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 3, 2020No. 2:12-cv-02242Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN RE SPRINT NEXTEL DERIVATIVE Case No. 12-2242-JWB-KGG (Lead Case1) LITIGATION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the court on motions to dismiss by Defendant Sprint Communications, Inc. and by the individually-named Defendants.2 (Docs. 88, 91.) The motions have been fully briefed. (Docs. 96, 97, 98-1, 99-1,3 111, 112, 113.) For the reasons stated herein, Defendants’ motions to dismiss are GRANTED. I. Facts The following summary of allegations is taken from Plaintiffs’ consolidated and verified amended complaint. (Doc.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Ryan v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Shero v. City of Grove, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.