Hensel v. City of Little Falls
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this First Amendment case, Plaintiff Robin Hensel challenges two ordinances enacted by Defendant City of Little Falls, Minnesota (the “City”). Presently before the Court are the parties’ cross-Motions for Summary Judgment. For the reasons that follow, the Motions will be granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
I. The “old sign ordinance” and the “old bench ordinance”
The City is a small community of approximately 8,000 residents, located about 100 miles northwest of Minneapolis. It has had an ordinance (City Code §…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Ricci v. DeStefanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Willson v. City of Bel-NorDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018