Legal Opinion
In Re OBrien
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 4, 2011No. 20-01024PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION REGARDING TRUSTEE’S OBJECTION TO DEBTORS’ AMENDED EXEMPTIONS AND TRUSTEE’S MOTION FOR TURNOVER
JAMES D. GREGG, Chief Judge.
I. ISSUES.
Cory S. OBrien (“Mr. OBrien”) and Mary A. OBrien (“Mrs. OBrien”) (collectively the “Debtors”) 1 filed an amended Schedule C claiming their federal and state tax refunds as exempt. The Debtors were represented by Dawn I. Krupp (“Debtors’ Attorney”) throughout this case. Jeff A. Moyer (“Trustee”) timely filed an objection to the Debtors’ amended exemptions and requested a turnover of the refunds.
The Trustee has raised many objections to the amended…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Desiderio v. Parikh (In re Parikh)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Dignity Health v. Seare (In re Seare)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Massey v. Pappalardo (Massey)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2012
- Rice v. Allard (In re Rice)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2012
- Bakwin v. MardirosianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.