Legal Opinion
(PS) Novak v. Mendez
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 11, 2021No. 2:20-cv-01721Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSEPH WILLIAM NOVAK, No. 2:20-cv-01721 JAM AC PS 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER and 13 TINA MENDEZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this matter pro se, and pre-trial proceedings are accordingly 17 referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending is a motion to 18 dismiss from all remaining defendants: Tina M. Mendez and Prober & Raphael, a Law 19 Corporation. ECF No. 21. Defendant Americhem Mortgage Company, LLC has been…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- NORTH STAR INTERNATIONAL, a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Noll v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Western Mining Council v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.