Legal Opinion

In re Rothenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 1988PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in 1973 and maintains an office for the practice of law in the City of Kingston.

Charge I of the petition commencing this disciplinary proceeding alleges that respondent wrote checks on his attorney escrow account when there were insufficient funds in the account to cover such checks. Charge II alleges that respondent maintained false or inaccurate records concerning his attorney escrow account. Charge III alleges that respondent converted funds belonging to his clients. Charge IV alleges that respondent failed to deposit…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re AnschellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re BartholomewAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. In re RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. In re RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API