Legal Opinion

In re Rothenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 10, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in 1973; his last known address is North Woodstock, Ulster County. He is currently suspended from practice by order of this Court (Matter of Rothenberg, 143 AD2d 479 [1988]).

Petitioner alleges in charge I that respondent engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in contravention of this Court’s order of suspension (see Judiciary Law § 90 [2]; 22 NYCRR 806.9 [a]; 1200.16 [b]), in charge II that respondent, during the period *773of suspension, converted funds received on behalf of others (see 22 NYCRR 1200.3 [a]…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re WheatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re KelleherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. In re RothenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API