Vinik v. Niagara Fire Insurance

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Pabker, J.

At the outset, respondent makes two technical objections to the grounds of appeal filed in this court. The first is that instead of assigning that the Supreme Court affirmed the judgment in the trial court when it should have reversed it, the grounds of appeal invoke1 the alleged errors in the trial court, contrary to the rule laid down in Diamond Mills Paper Co. v. Leonard Ice Co., 95 N. J. L. 540, and other eases. But we find that the grounds of appeal in this court do in fact assign that the Supreme Court erred in affirming the judgment in…