Legal Opinion

Dynasty, Inc. v. Princeton Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 24, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

754 A.2d 1137 (2000)

165 N.J. 1

DYNASTY, INC., t/a Hollywood Lights, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

The PRINCETON INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 13, 2000

Decided July 24, 2000

Allan Maitlin, West Orange, argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Sachs, Maitlin, Fleming, Greene, Wilson & Marotte, attorneys).

James J. Guida, Lyndhurst, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by VERNIERO, J.

In this insurance litigation, plaintiff seeks payment from defendant insurer for the loss of plaintiff's commercial premises. The…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. HockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  2. Vornado, Inc. v. HylandSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  3. Lesniak v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Guzzi v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
  5. Raphtis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API