People v. Mann
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. William T. Wallace, Judge. « The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
The defendant was convicted of the offense of “ an attempt to commit grand larceny.” It is now insisted that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict of the jury, and this brings us to a consideration of the sole question involved in the case, and that is as to the amount and character of evidence necessary to constitute the offense of attempt to commit *77grand larceny. It is practically admitted that, if the defendant had finally been successful in securing the money of the prosecuting witness Manino, the offense would have been grand larceny. But his hopes and plans in that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. StitesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. WernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. GartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- People v. LombardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- People v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.