Nicoson v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Chief Judge.
Today we decide an issue of first impression regarding the application of double jeopardy principles when a defendant's sentence is enhanced based on his use of a deadly weapon. Appellant-defendant Joshua G. Nicoson appeals the five-year sentence enhancement that the trial court imposed for the use of a firearm following his conviction for Criminal Confinement with a Deadly Weapon,1 a class B felony. Specifically, Nicoson argues that the enhanced penalty constituted an impermissible "double enhancement" in violation of double jeopardy principles. Appellant's Br. p.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Mallard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Nicoson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Nicoson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Ryan Browne v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015