Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Apex Roofing & Insulation, Inc. v. Union Indemnity Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 16, 1989No. 88-3481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an action under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. secs. 270a and 270b. Hradesky appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss based on lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the district court’s conclusion that the plaintiff acted reasonably to mitigate damages.

Apex Roofing and Insulation, Inc. (“Apex”) filed this action against Ed Hradesky individually and d/b/a Chematics of Pa(s) (“Chematics”), Union Indemnity Insurance Company of New York (“Union Indemnity”) and S.V.S. Building and Development Corporation (“SVS”). SVS was the prime contractor under a United States…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. Standard Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  2. Hicks v. Bank of WrightsvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Henderson v. Nucon Construction Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Union Indemnity Insurance Company of New York, SvsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API