United States ex rel. Henderson v. Nucon Construction Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
The district court dismissed a subcontractor’s Miller Act suit for faüure to join the general contractor-as an indispensable party. The court also awarded attorney fees to the defendants. Because we hold the general contractor is not an indispensable party in a Miller Act suit by a subcontractor-against the Miller Act surety, we reverse the dismissal, vacate the award of attorney fees, and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
Centric-Jones, a Colorado limited partnership, was the general contractor on a contract with the Federal Bureau of Reclamation to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kilkenny v. Arco Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States ex rel. Reed v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- National Surety Corporation v. The United States of America for the Use of Way Panama, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- United States Ex Rel. Way Panama, S. A. v. Uhlhorn InternationalDistrict Court, Canal Zone · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Maris Equipment Co. v. Morganti, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Safe Environment of America, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2003
- United States Ex Rel. CBC of Charleston, Inc. v. RCS Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2005
- United States of America v. Best Choice Construction, LLCDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2023
- United States v. Nucon Construction CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995