Legal Opinion

Farmer v. R. B. Cassity DBA Cassity Lumber Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1953No. A-4286PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilson

The question certified in this case concerns the proper forum for inquiry into the validity of a supersedeas bond.

Respondent R. B. Cassity recovered judgment against Elbert Farmer on a promissory note. Farmer gave notice and perfected his appeal by filing a supersedeas bond executed by James E. Faulkner as Deputy Attorney In Fact for Lawyers Surety Corporation.

The Court of Civil Appeals, 252 S.W. 2d 788, affirmed the judgment of the trial court and then under Rule 435, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, rendered judgment against both the defendant and Lawyers Surety Corporation. After issuance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cruger v. McCrackenTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Farmer v. CassityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nutter v. PharesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Perry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1957
  3. Hager v. State Ex Rel. TeVaultCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  4. Farmer v. CassityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Hager v. State Ex Rel. TeVaultCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API