Legal Opinion

Mikus v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 22, 2000No. 1 — 98 — 4289PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE O’MARA FROSSARD

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiff, Ronald Mikus, brought this suit against his employer, defendant Norfolk and Western Railway Company, seeking damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U.S.C. §§ 51 through 60 (1988)) (FELA). Plaintiff was injured during his employment as a railroad conductor, when he was struck by a railroad crossing gate arm, which was broken by a truck going through lowering gates at the crossing. Plaintiff claimed this injury was the result of a malfunction in the crossing signals and the negligence of defendant. As…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Maple v. GustafsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Lee v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Leonardi v. Loyola University of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. LaFever v. Kemlite Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Inman v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bachman v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Ner Tamid Congregation of N. Town v. KrivoruchkoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. Smith v. MARVIN, MDAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Balough v. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  5. Dixon v. Union Pacific RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API