In Re Advance Printing and Litho Company
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF DECISION OF REFEREE
WILLSON, District Judge.
In this bankruptcy case, a secured creditor, Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., has petitioned this Court, pursuant to the provisions of 11 U..S.C.A. § 67, to review a decision and order of the Referee entered January 10, 1967, in this matter. The order complained of allowed but partial payment, on a secured claim, of Rosenthal’s against the bankrupt, Advance Printing & Litho Company.
On May 6, 1963, Advance, a Pennsylvania corporation, executed a judgment note in the face amount of $26,000, payable to Rosenthal in 35…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. McKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- In Re Tastyeast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Houghten v. Restland Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Steve Tinsman and Nancy Tinsman v. Moline Beneficial Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Sholos (In Re Sholos)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Maimone v. Columbia Savings Bank (In Re Maimone)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
- Lapiana v. Bank of Ravenswood (In Re Lapiana)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
- In Re Appropriate Interest Rate on Secured ClaimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.