Legal Opinion

In Re Advance Printing and Litho Company

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1967No. 64-50PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF DECISION OF REFEREE

WILLSON, District Judge.

In this bankruptcy case, a secured creditor, Rosenthal & Rosenthal, Inc., has petitioned this Court, pursuant to the provisions of 11 U..S.C.A. § 67, to review a decision and order of the Referee entered January 10, 1967, in this matter. The order complained of allowed but partial payment, on a secured claim, of Rosenthal’s against the bankrupt, Advance Printing & Litho Company.

On May 6, 1963, Advance, a Pennsylvania corporation, executed a judgment note in the face amount of $26,000, payable to Rosenthal in 35…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vanston Bondholders Protective Committee v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Hedges v. Dixon CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Manufacturers' Finance Co. v. McKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. In Re Tastyeast, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  5. Houghten v. Restland Memorial Park, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Steve Tinsman and Nancy Tinsman v. Moline Beneficial Finance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Sholos (In Re Sholos)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  3. Maimone v. Columbia Savings Bank (In Re Maimone)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1984
  4. Lapiana v. Bank of Ravenswood (In Re Lapiana)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  5. In Re Appropriate Interest Rate on Secured ClaimsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API