Legal Opinion

Nahum v. The Boeing Company

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided April 2, 2020No. 2:19-cv-01114Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 8 ) 9 SETONDJI NAHUM, ) ) CASE NO. 2:19-cv-1114-BJR 10 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 11 v. ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION ) AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ 12 THE BOEING COMPANY, et al., ) MOTION TO DISMISS ) 13 Defendants. ) ____________________________________) 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the Court are two motions: (1) pro se Plaintiff Setondji Nahum’s (“Plaintiff”) 17 Motion for Reconsideration, Dkt. No. 43, of the Court’s Order Granting in Part and Denying in 18 Part Defendants The Boeing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ivey v. Board of Regents of University of AlaskaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API