Legal Opinion

Farr v. Whitney

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 27, 1927PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carroll. J.

These three actions of tort were tried together. They resulted from a collision of the defendant’s *195automobile with an automobile owned by the plaintiff Farr. The plaintiff Kathleen B. Watson was a passenger in Farr’s automobile, and suffered personal injuries; George C. Watson’s action is for expenses thereby incurred. The action of Farr v. Whitney is to recover for damages to the plaintiff’s automobile. Both vehicles were legally registered.

In the action of Farr v. Whitney there was evidence that the defendant, in passing Farr’s vehicle, “turned in too sharply to the right so that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  2. Bourne v. WhitmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Newcomb v. Boston Protective DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Dudley v. Northampton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. Conroy v. MatherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Baggs v. HirschfieldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Leveillee v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  3. Isaacson v. Boston, Worcester & New York Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Stowe v. MasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Potter v. GilmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API