Legal Opinion

United States v. Alberto

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 13, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01014Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, CIVIL NO. 3:18-CV-1014 y (JUDGE CAPUTO) ROSSY ALBERTO d/b/a RA MULTISERVICES AND IMMIGRATION, RA IMMIGRATION SERVICES, and RA MULTISERVICES Defendant. MEMORANDUM Presently before me is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) filed by Plaintiff United States of America (“Plaintiff’ or “the Government”) against Defendant Rossy Alberto, doing business as RA Multiservices and Immigration; RA Immigration Services; and RA Multiservices (“Defendant” or “Alberto”), seeking a permanent…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Orsatti v. New Jersey State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  4. Richard M. Wishkin v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  5. Howard Hess Dental Laboratories Inc. v. Dentsply International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API