Linderman Machine Co. v. Shaw-Walker Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon; Sullivan, J. Assumpsit by the Linderman Machine Company against the Shaw-Walker Company for the value of certain machinery. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
STONE J.
Action of assumpsit to recover the price and value of a machine known as a standard five-foot Linderman automatic dovetail glue jointer, sold by the plaintiff to the defendant in the summer of 1912. The plaintiff is a corporation located in the city of Muskegon, whose business consisted wholly, or in part, of the manufacture of wood-working machinery. The defendant was engaged in the manufacture of various classes of woodwork, such as filing cabinets, bookcases, desks, etc. The declaration was upon the common counts in assumpsit; the plea was the general issue, with a notice: Thai…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hakes v. ThayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Phelps v. WhitakerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Foster v. RowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Detroit Shipbuilding Co. v. ComstockMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- H. W. Williams Transportation Line v. Darius Cole Transportation Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John D. Gruber Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Youngs v. Advance-Rumely Thresher Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Bates Tractor Co. v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Don McCullagh, Inc. v. DimitroffMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Loud v. Federal InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.