Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh's Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1934No. Appeal, 115PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

The secretary of banking, September 23, 1931, took possession of Franklin Savings & Trust Company under the Banking Act of June 15, 1923, P. L. 809 1 ; see section 21 et seq. At that time, the City of Pittsburgh, appellant, had in the bank two deposits made by the same city official, one, in his capacity as city treasurer, the other, in his capacity as collector of delinquent taxes. In 1933, the secretary filed his first and partial account showing, among other things, that two dividends had been paid to depositors, one of 10% July 20, 1932, and the other of 8%…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Board of Com'rs v. StrawnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
  2. Yellowstone County v. First Trust & Savings BankMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Myers v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
  4. City of Lincoln v. MorrisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  5. South Philadelphia State Bank's InsolvencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lansdowne Bank and Trust Co.'s CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Royersford Trust Company CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Reicheldifer's AppealSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API