Legal Opinion

State v. Flygare

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 6, 2015No. 20140741-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Decision

DAVIS, Judge:

T1 Jeremy Flygare appeals from the district court's denial of his motion for satisfaction of judgment based on his argument that a restitution judgment entered against him in 2005 had expired under the applicable eight-year statute of limitations. We affirm.

12 Flygare argues that the district court denied his motion based on an incorrect interpretation of the applicable statutes. "We review questions of statutory mterpreta— tion for correctness, affording no deference to the district court's legal conclusions." State v. Gallegos, 2007 UT 81, ¶ 8, 171 P.3d 426.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. GallegosUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Sorensen v. BarbutoUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Miller v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Board of Pardons and ParoleCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
  2. State v. PhillipCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API