Legal Opinion

Staples v. Schmid

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 25, 1893PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Dependants’ petition for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The jury have substantially found in this case that the defendants’ salesman erroneously suspecting the plaintiff of having stolen a package of spoons from the store which was in his charge, detained her, sent for a police officer, and caused her to be sent to the police station and there searched, and they assessed the damages to the plaintiff in the sum of seven hundred and fifty dollars.

The defendants bring their ¡petition for a new trial alleging that the verdict is against the evidence, that if the facts were as found the defendants are not liable and that the damages are excessive.

The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Rounds v. . Del., Lack. West. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Mali v. . LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Lynch v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
  5. Smith v. WebsterMichigan Supreme Court · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winn & Lovett Grocery Co. v. ArcherSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. S. H. Kress & Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. J. J. Newberry Co. v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. AAA Pool Service & Supply, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. HollidaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API