Legal Opinion
In Re Tobacco Cases I
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 10, 2004No. D043173PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
House of Prince, A/S, a Danish corporation (HOP), appeals an order denying its motion to compel arbitration of the application (Application) of the State of California (State) to the superior court for enforcement of the master settlement agreement (MSA), to which HOP and State are parties. HOP contends the trial court erred by concluding the MSA’s arbitration clause does not require arbitration of the claims asserted by State in the Application.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
On November 23, 1998, the Attorneys General of State, 45 other states, the District of Columbia,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mundi v. Union Security Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Efund Capital Partners v. PlessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Crowley Maritime Corp. v. Boston Old Colony Ins.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Stenehjem v. Philip Morris, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Crowley Maritime v. Boston Old Colony Ins.California Court of Appeal · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.