In RE COLLINSON ESTATE v. McNutt
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
This action was transferred from the Appellate Court under §4-215, Burns’ 1946 Replacement, Acts of 1933, ch. 151, §1, p. 800. Following oral argument which was had before this court and after further careful consideration, it developed that the judges participating held widely divergent views as to the principles of law which should govern the decision of the case, and a majority could not agree.
Draper, J., having been a member of the Appellate Court at the time the action herein was under consideration by that court, did not participate.
Jasper, C. J., and Bobbitt, J. are of the opinion that…
Also in this document: Concurrence · Jasper; Concurrence · Gilkison.
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Pokraka v. Lummus Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Wilson, Admx. v. RollingsIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
- Ward v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Devol v. DyeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Thomas' Adm'r v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Hauck v. Second National Bank of RichmondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Fort Wayne National Bank v. ScherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Capes v. BargerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Thomas v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Dunnewind v. CookIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.