Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Williams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1958No. 29,524PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, C. J.

Arterburn, J., has heretofore declared himself to be incompetent to participate in the decision in this case.

Bobbitt, C. J., and Achor, J., are of the opinion that the decision of the trial court should be affirmed, while Emmert and Landis, JJ., are of the opinion that the decision of the trial court should be reversed and the appellant granted a new trial.

The four judges participating being equally divided at the last term of court and being still equally divided at this term, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed without costs. Section 2-3232, Burns’ 1946 Replacement, Acts 1881 (Spec.…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Bobbitt; Concurrence · Emmert.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Kirkpatrick v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. State ex rel. Collins v. JacksonMississippi Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Griebel v. State ex rel. NiezerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Brown v. GeorgettaNevada Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Snyder v. KingIndiana Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Boyle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Boyle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Haggerty v. Marion County Election BoardIndiana Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Marion County Election Board v. O'BRIENIndiana Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API