Legal Opinion
Haijek & Simecek v. Luck
Texas Supreme Court
Decided May 18, 1903No. 1170PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Question certified from the Court of Civil Appeals for the First District, in an appeal from Fayette County.
1Opinion of the Court
GAINES, Chief Justice.
following question has been certified for our decision:
“This was an action brought by the appellee in the court below to recover of the appellants as the makers of a certain promissory note a balance due thereon after deducting a credit of more than 33 1-3 per cent received by the appellee, an accepting creditor, from the assignee of Haijek & Simecek in a general assignment made by them in accordance with the statute of this State, for the benefit of such of their creditors as would accept the assignment and discharge them from further liability. The assignment was made…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boese v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Keating v. VaughnTexas Supreme Court · 1881
- Patty-Joiner & Eubank Co. v. CumminsTexas Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. StarSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Star v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Greene v. RiceIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
- Pelton v. SheridanOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Scott v. Nunn Electric Supply Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.