Legal Opinion

Tutt v. City of Greenville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided March 2, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Carroll

Affirming.

The city of Greenville bas an ordinance prohibiting cattle from running at large in the city and making it a misdemeanor for any person to suffer or permit his cattle to be at large in the city. The appellant, Tutt, resides outside of the city limits, and under a warrant issued against him for suffering a cow owned by him to run at large and wander into the city he was arrested and fined in the police court. Thereafter he brought this suit in the circuit court against the city and the police judge, seeking to prohibit them from enforcing the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Varden v. MountCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  2. City of Paducah v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Earle v. Latonia Agr. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KrogerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. De Queen v. FentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. In re FowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. City of Pascagoula v. DelmasMississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Rieser v. WardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API