Legal Opinion
Dominick Urso v. United States of America, Cross-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided January 2, 1996No. 95-1282, 95-1387PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Dominick Urso and his wife Leonarda Urso operate a landscaping business through their corporation, Dominick Urso Landscaping. Separate audits of the Ursos and their corporation — conducted by different auditors — reached inconsistent conclusions about the proper tax treatment of their financial affairs. Extended administrative proceedings, followed by this suit seeking a refund, resolved most issues in favor of the corporation, and the Commissioner accepts that decision. Now the inconsistency has been reversed. For example, the corporation was allowed to treat a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. BeebeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Billy D. Bammerlin v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Pedro Gomez, Fernando Magana, and Rigoberto VelaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Stone v. Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- C. Etta Rice v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Mid-America Tablewares, Inc. v. Mogi Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Palmquist v. SelvikCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- A.M., a Minor v. Jerry Butler, Superintendent of the Illinois Youth CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Elizabeth Greisz v. Household Bank (Illinois), N.A., and Golden Seal Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.