Legal Opinion

Fetter v. Maersk Line, Limited

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 27, 2020No. 2:14-cv-02108Unknown

1Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JASON FETTER Civil No.: 2:14-cv-02108 (KSH) Plaintiff, v. MAERSK LINE, LIMITED and 3MC MOBILE & MECHANICAL REPAIR OPINION LLC Defendants. Katharine S. Hayden, U.S.D.J. Before the Court are motions for summary judgment filed by co-defendants Maersk Line, Limited (“Maersk”) and 3MC Mobile & Mechanical Repair LLC (“3MC”), seeking dismissal of plaintiff Jason Fetter’s claims. For the reasons set forth below, Maersk’s and 3MC’s motions for summary judgment are granted. Because the Court dismisses all of Fetter’s claims against…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Chandris, Inc. v. LatsisSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Catherine Willis v. Childrens Hospital of PittsburCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API