Legal Opinion

United States v. Hudgins-Dize Co.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided February 18, 1949No. Civ. 850PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYAN, District Judge.

The United States sues to recover as liquidated damages- the amount of the underpayment of overtime wages, for alleged violations of the Public Contracts Act, Walsh-PIealey Act, June 30, 1936, c. 881, sec. 1, 49 Stat. 2036, May 13, 1942, c. 306, 56 Stat. 277, 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 35-45 grounding the action on the findings, conclusions and decision of the Secretary of Labor. Defendant to the action are the corporation, which was the party contracting with the United States in each of four contracts, the contractor’s sureties, and certain individuals whose liability was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Cox v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Acker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Jory v. BennightNevada Supreme Court · 1975
  2. United States v. Islip MacHine Works, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1959
  3. Ready-Mix Concrete Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  4. United States v. Sancolmar Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  5. United States v. Sweet Briar, Inc.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API